Blog

Latest Industry News

That is also tough to validate within excavation reports purely because if the building not exists then there could be evidence of a floor plan

That is also tough to validate within excavation reports purely because if the building not exists then there could be evidence of a floor plan

Just What it is more possible to assume is that the presence of loom weights in some aspects of the household, including the courtyard, would suggest that these areas were specialized in females (Allison, 1999: 71). In Roman society women could have done the weaving into the forecourts of your home as this is the ‘well-lit an element of the household’ (Allison: 1999: 70).

In comparing the houses from the two societies being studied it really is clear there are some spaces any particular one society demonstrates that the other doesn’t. As an example, in Greek houses wells for water are frequent (Goldberg, 1999: 153); this is simply not a thing that is mentioned within sources on Roman housing. Neither did Roman houses add a room only for the goal of male entertaining. Even the atriumwasusedby women for weaving (Allison, 1999: 71).

It really is maybe also worth noting that from the sources included through this study there is no mention of urban villas having a second floor. Nonetheless, you can find examples where houses are situated above shops such as for example in Ostia (Storey, 2001) and so are raised off the ground. That is also tough to validate within excavation reports purely because if the building not exists then there could be evidence of a floor policy for the bottom floor, but no proof the next floor would remain.

With studies like this 1 we encounter dilemmas. To essentially investigate this topic, more research needs to be performed which links the artefacts which are uncovered and just what this could reveal in regards to the household which they were found within. It’s not safe to assume that just because a product had been found in a space that this is how it belonged longterm, an excavation is only a ‘diachronic sample of debris reflecting patterns of use and behaviour over a protracted period’ (Ault et al., 1999: 52), and this snapshot of this household may possibly not be completely accurate.

Through the length of writing this essay it is often observed that conclusions are tough to draw as a result of nature of this material being managed. As an example, the irregular layout of Greek housing means that patterns are not easily identified since they are in Roman housing, you can find of course similarities between them and patterns into the rooms that most usually appear but there is no rigid layout which means that we could predict what we will see, as an example, not totally all houses had andronesand some houses had second floors whereas others failed to. Another fact to be taken under consideration is lot of the uses of those rooms is speculative. There was little evidence from primary sources from the time in regards to the uses for rooms, so how historians have suggested an use for a room they are doing so utilizing the artefacts which can be not at all times accurate (Allison, 2004).

It is difficult to directly compare the two forms of housing while the Greeks and Romans begin their housing in numerous methods, because of the Greeks dividing the household into genders, a thing that will not happen in Roman architecture.

It is a extremely limited cross part throughout the two societies and their houses resulting in the conclusions being limited by urban houses and poorer houses was different once more. This might be something to check into further. Therefore, ‘we remain woefully uninformed about lots of the patterns of social and economic relationships within and between households’ (Ault et al., 1999: 44).

,

To export a mention of the this article please decide on a referencing stye below:

If you should be the original composer of this essay and no longer wish to have work published regarding the UKDiss.com internet site then please:

Relevant Services

,

Our scholastic writing and marking services can help you!

Related Lectures

,

Study for free with your array of university lectures!

,

Looking for a flexible role?
are you experiencing a 2:1 degree or maybe more?

Research Resources

,

Free resources to work with you along with your university studies!

We’ve received widespread press coverage since 2003

Your UKEssays purchase is safe so we’re rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk

All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed in full!

We’re here to answer any questions you have got about our services

Copyright © 2003 – 2020 – UKEssays is just a trading name of All Answers Ltd, company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ.https://medium.com/@vladimirtrofimov049/3-best-business-essay-samples-89565e1951d8

*You also can browse our support articles here >

, “

3508 words (14 pages) Essay

8th Feb 2020 Archaeology Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was submitted by way of a university student. This is simply not a typical example of the work created by our Essay Writing Service. You can view types of our professional work here.

Any viewpoints, findings, conclusions or suggestions expressed in this material are those of this authors and never fundamentally reflect the views of UKEssays.com.

had been the ‘Dark Age’ of Greece really dark? Measure the Kinds of Evidence we’ve because of this Period of Greek Archaeology

The goal of this essay is always to explore whether or not the ‘Dark Age’ of Greece was a dark, bleak time in the nation’s history through taking into consideration the archaeological evidence found for conditions in those times. The Dark Age of Greece, also referred to as the Homeric Age, the Geometric Period or the Greek Dark Ages, is dated c.1000-750 B.C. This is the time scale that accompanied the collapse associated with the Mycenaean palatial civilisation as well as the state-level system of government that supported it (Alcock, 2012: 134). The Dark Age therefore covers the time scale dating from the end associated with the Mycenaean palatial civilisation around 1100-1000 B.C. towards the beginnings of this establishment associated with the Greek city states into the ninth century B.C.

If you’d like assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to simply help!

Archaeological finds declare that the Bronze Age civilisation experienced a collapse into the Eastern Mediterranean world the Dark Age if the metropolitan areas and palaces established by the Mycenaean’s were abandoned or destroyed (Lemos, 2002: 193). After several major metropolitan areas from Gaza to Troy collapsed fewer settlements remained and people which did showed signs of famine and a population decline (Alcock, 2012: 134). Also, Greek culture was in decline through the Dark Age while the Linear B writing of this Greek language employed by Mycenaean bureaucrats become extinct (Colavito, 2014: 50). Also, the decoration entirely on Greek pottery produced after c.1100 B.C. is less attractive than that on Mycenaean pottery and is instead limited by simple, geometric styles (Kidner et al., 2009: 69). In addition to this, it absolutely was believed that through the Dark Age all communication ceased involving the mainland of Greece and foreign abilities, resulting in too little cultural growth and progress (Colavito, 2014: 50). Nonetheless, the excavation of Lefkandi which began into the early 1980s challenged this belief while the site indicated that significant cultural and trade links remained set up between the Greek Islands as well as the East from around 900 B.C. onwards (Whitley, 2001: 78). Ergo, archaeological evidence suggests that not totally all elements of Greece were isolated or went into decline through the Dark Age.

To explore these points in more detail, the following paragraphs can have arguments for the Dark Ages being certainly ‘dark’ centered on archaeological evidence, and after that it’ll be suggested that archaeological evidence does exist, specially from Lefkandi, which suggests otherwise. Following this, conclusions is going to be presented on this topic.

exactly why the Mycenaean palatial civilisation collapsed remains under dispute. One theory is that the Dorian people invaded, destroying the Mycenaean palaces and therefore the infrastructure the Mycenaeans had created (Lemos, 2002: 191). The situation using this theory is that Mycenaean archaeological material that was found  dates to a period a long time after the invasion supposedly occurred. Also, areas where in actuality the Dorians purportedly settled, such as for example Laconia, remained depopulated until later into the tenth century B.C. (Lemos, 2002: 192).

nonetheless, Desborough argues that the available archaeological evidence is certainly in keeping with two major invasions occurring. He implies that the first invasion had been in charge of the catastrophe that occurred by the end of this Late Helladic IIIB, approximately 1200 B.C., and after that the invaders withdrew from the web sites that they had destroyed while they remained a danger for many of Central Greece as well as the Peloponnese through the entire Late Helladic IIIC (Lemos, 2002: 192). Following this invasion, Desborough argues that a second wave of arrivals, likely from the North-West of Greece arrived and it’s also this group that then account for the changes that occurred later into the period (Lemos, 2002: 192). Desborough also implies that the Dorians were only from the first wave of invasion. He argues that the second wave of invaders were a separate band of newcomers because of the different archaeological features that emerge; including the adoption of single burials as well as the introduction of new dress ornaments (Lemos, 2002: 192).

But Desborough’s theory is disputed by Snodgrass who implies that the changes that heralded the Dark Age are not owing to either invaders or new interlopers. Rather, he implies that it absolutely was because of revival of this Middle Helladic Substream, i.e. an overthrow associated with the Mycenaean palatial civilisation had been initiated by the reduced classes (Lemos, 2002: 192). This overthrow is reflected by the low socio-economic archaeological top features of this period such as for example single burials as well as the use of handmade pots (Lemos, 2002: 192-193). Nonetheless, neither of those theories are provable. The sole certainty is a crisis occurred by the end of this Mycenaean period resulting in a decline in population and social, economic and political upheaval.

The Dark Age of Greece began around 1100 B.C. when many settlements were abandoned; an event that indicates that a severe population decline began surrounding this date (Whiley, 2001: 79). This event was caused by a variety of social and overall economy (Thomas and Conant, 1999: 85-86).

It has been said that:

‘Some of this Aegean regions were abandoned, although some were populated and then destroyed or abandoned once more. People went in terms of Cyprus and Cilicia searching for better and safer places to call home. This mobility is well-documented into the archaeological record and posseses an essential effect into the crystallization of conditions into the Aegean as well as the eastern Mediterranean by the end of this Late Bronze Age’ (Lemos, 2002: 193).

A pattern that continues throughout the Dark Age of Greece could be the appearance of post-Mycenaean refugee settlements from c.1250 B.C. onwards (Whitley, 2001: 77-78). Generally, these sparse, isolated settlements were found over 500m above sea level, for instance the one at Karphi. These settlements maintained the old traditions but population levels failed to change through the Dark Age period, nor did any evolution or development occur (Whitley, 2001: 78). Dark Age settlement occupation patterns may also be characterised by decline in population or partial ruin as seen at Mycenae or by continuity with new elements, such as increased consumption of cattle, as seen at Nichoria (Thomas and Conant, 1999: 85).

The Dark Age of Greece had a significant affect the archaeological record while the structure of this countryside ahead of the Dark Age have been closely linked with palatial organisation. Consequently, the results of the Dark Age in archaeological terms was a decline in rural presence and a scarcity of settlements (Alcock, 2012: 134). Modern academics explain this decline by arguing that it was brought on by population decline, political chaos and a subsequent come back to pastoral activity, which departs fewer permanent traces regarding the countryside (Alcock, 2012: 134).

it really is generally accepted that Dark Age communities were poor and isolated and Early Iron Age settlements in Greece as well as the surrounding area tended to be small and disconnected from wider civilisation (Whitley, 2001: 86). A typical example of a normal Dark Age archaeological settlement is Nichoria into the south-west of Peloponnese (modern and ancient Messenia).

Our scholastic professionals are ready and waiting to aid with any writing project you might have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, it is possible to guarantee we’ve a site perfectly matched to your preferences.

The late Bronze Age settlement at Nichoria had been characterised by rectilinear structures arranged in rows of streets. Nonetheless, the settlement’s Dark Age predecessor had been found to consist of scattered household plots placed at odd angles to one another (Whitley, 2001: 84). An example of a typical structure discovered by archaeologists and dating towards the Dark Age period of settlement at Nichoria is Unit IV.1, which dates from the tenth century B.C. This building seemingly have been rectangular in form as well as its walls were built from mud brick put on stone foundations. The building had been crowned by way of a thatched roof which was supported by way of a timber frame (Whitley, 2001: 84-85).

The layout and building design of mud brick on stone foundations, thatched roof and lumber frame along with the scattered pattern of this settlements found to exist in tenth century B.C. Nichoria (Whitley, 2001: 84-85) are typical for the sort of buildings found in Dark Age Greece. With time, the rectangular buildings that dominated tenth century Nichoria evolved and provided solution to semi-circular types that have been larger than just what had opted before them (Whitley, 2001: 85; McDonald et al., 1983: 317). Also, like many Dark Age settlements, Nichoria had been found near to the sea, so although unfortified, it absolutely was positioned in a strong position that protected it from outside attack (McDonald et al., 1983: 317).

It is difficult to compare the settlement patterns of Nichoria to those present at Lefkandi as well as the linked settlement of Xeropolis. Nonetheless, Popham et al. (1980, p.7) observe that a number of the Dark Age settlement with this area had been surprisingly regular, rather more like the Bronze Age settlement at Nichoria than the sparse Dark Age dwellings mentioned by Whitley (2001, p.84). The same regular pattern of habitation exists at the Xeropolis site (Popham et al., 1980: 7). As such, it seems that, generally, settlement patterns in Dark Age Greece were sparse and scattered, maybe in response to social, economic and political upheaval, but that this pattern had been by no chance universal as illustrated by the samples of settlement patterns at Lefkandi and Xeropolis.

with regards to the forms of materials and proof diet and sustenance found in Dark Age settlements in Greece the material deposits at Nichoria declare that town had been materially poor.

as an example, some externally regional wheel-made pottery was found, as well as a number of bone ornaments, some trinkets and some iron, most of that has been stated in the spot in which it absolutely was found (Whitley, 2001: 85). Also, no imported material had been bought at Nichoria, indicating that it was a isolated settlement (Whitley, 2001: 85). But archaeological evidence does indicate that Dark Age Nichoria had been ‘rich’ in one single respect since it had a large availability of cattle and, therefore, meat. Analysis of animal bones bought at Nichoria implies that a lot more cattle were being grazed at Nichoria through the Dark Age than was in the Bronze Age. This evidence ‘indicates that there was clearly a switch away from reliance on cereal agriculture and pulses and towards herding of cattle’ through the Dark Age period (Whitley, 2001: 85). Although cereal production had not been abandoned at Nichoria through the Dark Age, the archaeological evidence demonstrates the rearing of cattle became more important in this age and had a greater affect the general diet of this residents within settlements than it did during other periods of Nichoria’s history (Whitley, 2001: 85). Exactly why this may function as case is herding was a more practical economic strategy when labour was in quick supply as a result of population decline but land remained plentiful (Whitley, 2001: 85-86). Another exemplory instance of large volumes of meat consumption at A dark Age site was bought at Kavousi Kastro and Kavousi Vronda into the uplands of Crete. Nonetheless, in this area sheep/goat had been more frequently grazed than cattle. As an example, archaeological findings indicate that sheep accounted for 70 % of bones identified at both web sites (838 from Vronda and 2164 from Kastro) (Whitley, 2001: 86). By way of contrast, cattle and pig only accounted for 5 to 8 % of all of the bones identified at both web sites (Whitley, 2001: 86). Dramatically, the Kavousi Kastro and Kavousi Vronda area was heavily grazed by sheep and goats throughout history and this pattern continues in to the current (Whitley, 2001: 86). The samples of archaeological findings at Nichoria, Kavousi Kastro and Kavousi Vronda therefore declare that subsistence methods were set up across Greece that allowed the people to survive during a economic depression.

Archaeological evidence found at Lefkandi, situated on the south shores of this island of Euboea directly challenges the proven fact that all areas of Greece were poor and isolated through the Dark Age. Lefkandi, like Nichoria, contained a loose number of households scattered within the neighbouring hills of Xeropolis and Toumba (Whitley, 2001: 86). Dark Age activity into the area goes back to 1100 B.C. and ends around 750 B.C., the date if the Archaic Period begins (Whitley, 2001: 78-79). In accordance with archaeological finds in the areas, there were six associated cemeteries found at Xeropolis alongside the keeps of a large proto-geometric building (Drissen, 1994: 252; Popham et al., 1993: 1; Whitley, 2001: 86-88). The chronology of Lefkandi may be especially identified through the pottery styles located on the site. These range between those unearthed that date from the sub-Mycenaean period to the Late Geometric period (Popham et al., 1980: 7, 11-12). Dramatically, at Xeropolis, evidence was found to declare that the ‘lost wax’ process for casting bronze was already in use by 900 B.C. (Whitley, 2001: 86). Also, the cemeteries bought at the settlement in both Lefkandi and, specially, Toumba revealed a few rich grave items. The six cemeteries located on the site are situated nearby the low hill slopes towards the north of Xeropolis (Popham et al., 1980: 101). For example pottery imported from nearby Attica and an abundance of gold ornaments, bronze things and faience, the origins of which were traced to Phoenicia and Egypt (Popham et al., 1980: 109). Nonetheless, the activity found in the cemeteries spans a reduced period than that of the total site record, corresponding aided by the sub-Mycenaean towards the sub-Protogeometric periods (c.1100-825 B.C) (Driessen, 1994: 252). This pattern of usage is consistent across all six cemeteries situated on the site; earlier activity had been found toward the north and east of each and every site and later activity into the south and west of each and every cemetery (Popham et al., 1980: 105). This implies that the cemeteries were in use for many of this period and that the inhabitants of Lefkandi remained comfortably well off with access to exotic items for many of this so-called Dark Age.

also, in 1981, archaeologists discovered a sizable, semi-circular building regarding the Toumba hill which was constructed in a complicated manner regarded as impossible into the context of tenth century B.C. Greece (Whitley, 2001: 86). This is a large Protogeometric structure put on the Toumba hillock so that it occupies the highest point of this settlement and overlooks the nearby cemeteries (Popham et al., 1993: 1). The building had been 40 m in length and made out of dressed stone wall and mud brick. In addition had a exterior wall of post-settings to aid the roof (Whitley, 2001: 86). Nonetheless, academics are not sure about what the building had been at it absolutely was found to be unfinished and rich burials were discovered under the floor but it is uncertain whether or not the burials were set up ahead of the mysterious building had been built (Whitley, 2001: 86). But even though the intent behind the building is uncertain the methods used to make it, alongside the rich grave items bought at Lefkandi and Toumba ,as well as proof the lost wax process occurring at Xeropolis through the Dark Age implies that the time scale had been a lot more prosperous of this type than generally accepted.

it is often suggested that Lefkandi is atypical of Dark Age web sites, as opposed to evidence that the Dark Age had not been completely a dark time for Greece. First, Lefkandi, unlike most Dark Age sites, is not a remote settlement (Whitley, 2001: 77-78). Additionally it is unlike other Cretan web sites from the same period per cartographic analysis of this area (Desborough, 1975: 675-676; 199). Whilst the Euboean Gulf makes Lefkandi an isolated settlement, it really is only elevated 17m above sea level, less than most Dark Age sites, such as for example another Cretan Dark Age site, Karphi which can be 500m above sea level (Whitley, 2001: 78). Also, Lefkandi had two natural harbours, indicating that it was far from remote and inaccessible.  Xeropolis is similarly atypical for the Greek Dark Age due to its unfortified coastal location and its dating towards the Late Helladic era. As such, it could be argued that Lefkandi as well as the surrounding area may be an atypical example for the Dark Age period, maybe suggesting that this web site can be an exception rather than the rule for Dark Age Greece.

The archaeological evidence from Dark Age Greece is ambiguous in relation to whether or not the Dark Age was ‘dark’ or perhaps not. If the range of evidence bought at Nichoria is known as, it really is apparent that this is a dark time for that settlement. Housing had been sparsely lay out; materials only originated in the geographic area and there were higher quantities of meat consumption than there was indeed into the Bronze Age. Nonetheless, the archaeological evidence present at Lefkandi as well as its satellite settlements at Xeropolis and Toumba paints a different photo. Here it really is apparent that the regional citizens had usage of high priced and exotic materials as evidenced by analysis of grave items bought at burials at the six cemeteries in your community dating back towards the Dark Age period. Similarly, a sizable mysterious building partly constructed regarding the Toumba hill suggests that the area population had usage of architectural skills and materials thought impossible in Dark Age Greece. Hence, the exemplory instance of Lefkandi generally seems to declare that Dark Age Greece was far less bleak and cut off from the wider world than previously thought. On the other hand, maybe it’s suggested that Lefkandi can be an atypical example. The settlement is found using one of this Greek islands and this area may were less severely affected than mainland Greece. Also, historical interpretation of this end of this Mycenaean palatial civilisation by professionals such as for example Desborough and Snodgrass implies that historical and archaeological evidence from this period is vague and ready to accept interpretation. Ergo, whilst the archaeological evidence found at Lefkandi is interesting and compelling, it really is confusing if it is typical or atypical for the Dark Age period. As such, it may nevertheless be argued that the Dark Age had been indeed a dark period of greece’s history.

Bibliography

,

To export a mention of the this article please decide on a referencing stye below:

If you should be the original composer of this essay and no longer wish to have work published regarding the UKDiss.com internet site then please:

Relevant Services

,

Our scholastic writing and marking services can help you!

Related Lectures

,

Study for free with your array of university lectures!

,

Looking for a flexible role?
are you experiencing a 2:1 degree or maybe more?

Research Resources

,

Free resources to work with you along with your university studies!

We’ve received widespread press coverage since 2003

Your UKEssays purchase is safe so we’re rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk

All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed in full!

We’re here to answer any questions you have got about our services

Copyright © 2003 – 2020 – UKEssays is just a trading name of All Answers Ltd, company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ.

*You also can browse our support articles here >

, “

3505 words (14 pages) Essay

8th Feb 2020 Archaeology Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was submitted by way of a university student. This is simply not a typical example of the work created by our Essay Writing Service. You can view types of our professional work here.

Any viewpoints, findings, conclusions or suggestions expressed in this material are those of this authors and never fundamentally reflect the views of UKEssays.com.

The mystery of field 9

Box 9 encompassed a whole skull, articulated pelvis and right femur, all from a single, unknown individual. Sex, age, ethnicity, height and pathology had been determined making use of both metric and morphological forensic anthropological practices. Metric analysis is advantageous as it’s better to learn and reproduce, hinges on standard landmarks, and results in fewer indeterminate conclusions (Giles, 1970). Nonetheless, disadvantages are the dependence on unfragmented bones and population-specific formulae. Therefore, if keeps are burned or fragmented, a qualitative method is needed, nonetheless, these may be subjective and lack of consistency (Giles, 1970). Alongside this, facial reconstruction and DNA profiling provided further evidence to simply help determine this individual.

If you’d like assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to simply help!

Pathology is important to take into account before determining sex, age and ethnicity to avoid bias. This individual has many common faculties of acromegaly- a rare disorder caused by over-production of human growth hormone from the pituitary gland, these generally include an enlarged skull, protruding mandible, mispositioned teeth and extortionate bone outgrowth around sutures (Chapman, 2017). Although these features could also indicate gigantism, this individual’s pelvis and femur are within normal ranges, suggesting the situation had been acquired in adulthood which only occurs in acromegaly patients (NIDDK, 2012). Acromegaly progression is frequently connected to type 2 diabetes, hypertension, osteoarthritis and severe muscle tissue weakness, which, if left untreated, may lead to early death- it could have caused this individual to truly have a stooped posture and frequent cardiovascular complications (Chapman, 2017). While the pelvis and femur don’t have any signs of condition or damage, it’s unlikely this individual had osteoarthritis, however, absence of organs and muscles means other conditions can not be ruled out as reason behind death.

Ferembach’s (1980) qualitative method for skull sex determination indicated most features were hyper-male (see figure 1), nonetheless, a rough but medium thickness zygomatic process and a somewhat flexed posterior border of this mandibular ramus showed neither female or male characteristics. Despite this, overall, it’s possible to predict that this individual was male.

4

3

5

1

2

6

Figure 1 shows top features of the cranium and mandible that indicated hyper-male faculties making use of Ferembach’s (1980) method. 1: prominent glabella, 2: vertical mastoid process, 3: blunted supraorbital ridges, 4: inclined forehead, 5: quadrectangular orbitals and 6: robust, broad mandible.

Alternatively, Giles and Elliot’s (1963) discrimination function is just a quicker method with similar accuracy of 86.6%. Making use of formula 1, outlined in Appendix D, a value of 2994.9 is obtained, also suggesting this individual was male, increasing reliability of conclusions. Krogman (1962) unearthed that sexing the skull alone is 90% accurate, nonetheless, sexing the skull and pelvis together is 98% accurate. Hence, to boost accuracy of final conclusions, the pelvis and femur need to be analysed too.

The pelvis is the most readily useful indicator of sex due to its adaptation for childbirth in females. Phenice’s (1969) morphological strategy makes use of 3 pubis faculties to ascertain sex- one of which can be the ventral arc, reported to be 96% accurate in determining sex (Sutherland and Suchey, 1991). Unfortuitously, this system produced mixed results for this pelvis, therefore, alternatively, Albanese’s (2003) metric analysis, outlined in Appendix B, makes use of the complete pelvis and femur to boost accuracy and reduce subjectivity of sex determination. Making use of model 1, which includes 98% accuracy, a value of 0.26 is obtained, suggesting this individual was female. Yet, model 2 and 3, which may have 97% and 96.3% accuracy respectively, obtain 0.62 and 0.94, plainly indicating male. Although model 2 and 3 have lower accuracy, their matching outcome increases confidence and legitimacy, enabling anyone to conclude this individual was male.

Bass (1978) unearthed that a femur head diameter >47.5mm indicates male while

but, cranial suture closure is known as unreliable and inaccurate as it usually under‐ages older adults and over‐ages sub-adults (Molleson and Cox 1993). More over, this individual’s acromegaly caused extortionate outgrowth of bone round the sutures, potentially affecting their closure and, thus, impacting age determination. As a result, an even more reliable approach to ageing the skull involves considering dentition.

Teeth will be the least destructible an element of the human anatomy, making them exemplary for age estimation. No deciduous dentition and proof tooth 8 alveolar processes indicate this individual was at least 18 yrs . old (Carr, 1962). Dental wear analysis provides more accurate age determination than those mentioned before as it examines enamel which can not be remodelled. a widely used method involves analysing of mandibular molar wear (Miles 1963), but, as shown in figure 5 and 6, extortionate ante- and postmortem tooth loss means only two mandibular molars exist, preventing any valid age estimation.

 

Figure 5, photographs showing mandibular (A) and maxillary (B) dentition. 1) identifies web sites of postmortem tooth loss, 2) shows antemortem tooth loss, 3) suggests alveolar processes of molar 3 and 4) suggests aspects of decay.

Figure 6, utilising the University of Sheffield dental chart, shows which teeth are present, which were extracted and any fractures seen.

Back to top