Blog

Latest Industry News

Samples of the very best abstracts submitted into the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract when it comes to ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Samples of the very best abstracts submitted into the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract when it comes to ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

From May of 1833 to March of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an aggressive campaign to gain political and religious autonomy through the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs for the Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an district that is indian. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to bring back self-government and control of land and resources represents a significant “recover of Native space.” Equally significant is what happened once that space was recovered.

The main topics this paper addresses an understudied and period that is essential the annals of this Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a growing body of literature from the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the time scale between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks due to the fact Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the battle to regain the parsonage he occupied, its resources, therefore the grouped community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power inside the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse while the parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking community identity that is mashpee. This study examines reports that are legislative petitions, letters, and legal documents to construct a narrative of Native agency when you look at the antebellum period. Note: This is part of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation and the Evolving Community Identity in the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

Sample 2: “Private Paths to Public Places: Local Actors plus the development of National Parklands into the American South”

This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and organizations that are non-governmental the development of parklands through the American South. While current historiography primarily credits the government because of the creation of parks and protection of natural wonders, an investigation of parklands within the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the significance of local and non-government sources when it comes to preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the necessity of a national bureaucracy setting the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but focus on opposition towards the imposition of brand new rules governing land when confronted with some outside threat. Regardless of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative, the significance of local individuals into the development of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history. Several examples in the American South raise concerns concerning the narrative that is traditional governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained curiosity about both nature preservation and in creating spaces for public recreation in the local level, and finds that the “private road to public parks” merits further investigation.

Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks when you look at the American South” was subsequently selected for publication into the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

Sample 3: Untitled

Previous generations of English Historians have produced a rich literature about the Levellers and their role into the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily focused on the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and thought that is political. Typically, their push to extend the espousal and franchise of a theory of popular sovereignty has been central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a fragmented sect of millenarian radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility that they will make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to find a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their religious ideas. Rather than focusing on John Lilburne, often taken while the public face regarding the Leveller movement, this paper will focus on the equally intriguing and much more thinker that is consistent William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement when you look at the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, I hope to suggest that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism when confronted with violent sectarians who sought to wield control over the Church of England. Even though Levellers were ultimately suppressed, Walwyn’s commitment to a tolerant society and a secular state should not be minimized but rather recognized as part of a larger debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper is designed to donate to the historiography that is rich of toleration and popular politics more broadly.

Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: A Case Study of this First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass murder have not only proliferated rapidly–they have become the expectation that is normative American society. When it comes to great majority of American history, however, events commonly defined as “mass murder” have resulted in no permanent memory sites as well as the sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the city and the nation could your investment tragedy and move on. All of this changed on May 29, 1989 as soon as the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial towards the thirteen people killed in the infamous “post office shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the actual situation of Edmond so that you can understand just why it became the memory that is first of the kind in united states of america history. I argue that the small town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities at the time associated with the shooting, along with the total that is near involvement established ideal conditions for the emergence with this unique variety of memory site domyhomework.services legit. I also conduct a historiography of the use of “the ribbon” in order to illustrate how it offers become the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society in the late century that is 20th. Lastly, I illustrate how the lack that is notable of between people mixed up in Edmond and Oklahoma City cases after the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity of those cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising number of aesthetic similarities that these memory sites share.

Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The search for Postmortem Identity throughout the Pax Romana”

“I am, the answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription if you want to know who. The Romans dealt with death in a variety of ways which incorporated a range of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as in the full case regarding the “ash and embers.” The romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence of the anonymous Roman also succinctly explained by the turn of the first century of this era. Cremation vanished by the third century, replaced by the practice for the distant past by the fifth century. Burial first began to take hold when you look at the western Roman Empire throughout the early second century, with the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites through the Roman world would not talk about the practices of cremation and burial in detail. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in form of burial vessels such as urns and sarcophagi represented the sole destination to move to investigate the transitional to inhumation in the Roman world. This paper analyzed a small corpus of such vessels to be able to identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns of the symbols to your fragments of text available relating to death within the Roman world. The analysis determined that the transition to inhumantion was a movement caused by a heightened desire on the element of Romans to preserve identity in death during and after the Pax Romana.

Leave comments

Your email address will not be published.*



You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Back to top